A National Academies report has backed a class-based approach as the “only possible practical” one for addressing organohalogen flame retardants. But a committee of the independent institution says the substances cannot be treated as a single class for hazard assessment.
The finding comes as the culmination of a process requested by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) to develop a hazard assessment scoping document to inform its consideration of a ban on nonpolymeric, additive organohalogen flame retardants (OFRs) from certain consumer products.
The 15 May report, prepared by a National Academies committee formed in response to this request, acknowledged “conceptual advantages” to addressing the chemicals as a class. These include more efficient assessments, avoiding regrettable substitutions and moving away from a default presumption of no risk where there is an absence of data.
Read the entire article on Chemical Watch